Blog to understand automation concepts in QTP, Selenium Webdriver and Manual Testing concepts

Understanding Risk Analysis flow

Risk is the potential loss to an organization. Projects usually have weaknesses or environment that may present threat to the project. The weaknesses can be called as vulnerabilities. Risk identified during planning phase needs to have some corrective actions called as controls which will come into action, if some risk is triggered. The controls are expected to reduce the risk or remove the risk as much as possible. Although controls and risk analysis can reduce the risk, but we can act as much as possible to reduce risk using the process.

 The risk is turned into a loss by threat. A threat is the trigger that causes the risk to become a loss. While it is difficult to deal with risks, one can deal very specifically with threats. Threats are reduced or eliminated by controls. Thus, control can be identified as anything that tends to cause the reduction of risk. If our controls are inadequate to reduce the risk, we have vulnerability. Vulnerability, therefore, can be defined as a flaw in the system of control that will enable a threat to be exploited. Risk Analysis is the process of evaluating risks, threats, controls, and vulnerabilities 


Scenarios that can happen based on how risk was handled during planning.


Case 1: Risk identified in Risk Analysis and proper control identified in case such scenario arise in future. Loss will be minimized or risk will be avoided in this case. Even in case of loss to Organisation, Stakeholder would be satisfied as the risk was expected to happen and with control in Place, the impact of the loss was reduced considerably




Case 2: Risk was identified during planning phase but proper control were not provided during analysis, thus loss was reduced but still the scenario could have been done in a better manner.



Case 3: In case no risk Analysis is in Place, in case a threat is triggered, It sends out panic within the team, though some action will be taken by stakeholder, but chances of loss to organisation are very high and it is highly possible that it is too late to correct the mistake and the loss has already done to the project. Thus impacting team, confidence with client, client business and relationship and own business also.


Once a risk happen, we have to take either of the control action which are described below:

  • Avoid the Risk – We should try to avoid the risk to convert into planning control activities to avoid risk.
  • Mitigate the Risk – In case a risk becomes an event and control were defined during planning to reduce the risk. We should have mitigation controls in place already defined during planning that would reduce impact of the risk.
  • Transfer the Risk – Insuring the project or transfer of work to specialized external team is a good way to transfer the risk in case avoiding the risk or mitigating the risk are not feasible .

  • Accept the Risk – There may be risk that does not have any solution and are not able to be channelized using either of above control action. An example could be change in regulations for a regulatory work. Such risk although should be analyzed during risk Analysis Phase


risk analysis


Risk Analysis should be done at different levels, and not only at leadership skill. Even risk Analysis should be done in everyday life periodically to identify if we are on right track or not.
In this series, in next article we will discuss on Risk templates, common risks in Quality, types of risk and how risk analysis happens



No comments:

Post a Comment